DME Journal of Law
https://dmejournals.com/index.php/DMEJL
<p>DME Journal of Law (DMEJL)</p> <p>DMEJL is a peer-reviewed and interdisciplinary academic biannual law e-journal by Delhi Metropolitan Education. It endeavors to serve as the leading forum for a thoughtful and scholarly engagement for a broad range of complex issues at the intersection of law, public policy, and social change in the world. DMEJL emphasizes on the representation of diverse perspectives and invites articles presenting opinions on fundamental, long-term, systemic problems of human rights and governance, as well as emerging issues, and possible solutions to them. It concerns itself with articles from all the diverse areas involving contemporarily socially and politically relevant legal issues ranging from business law, civil rights and civil liberties, environmental law and human rights, international law, law and gender, law and public policy, law and technology, sports and entertainment law. DMEJL encourages critical reflections that are based on empirical observations and experience as well as theoretical and multi-disciplinary approaches.</p>Delhi Metropolitan Educationen-USDME Journal of Law2583-2743Artificial Intelligence Governance and Legal Regulation: Emerging Trends and Challenges
https://dmejournals.com/index.php/DMEJL/article/view/619
<p>Artificial intelligence (AI) has become an integral part of governance, economics and law. Governments employ algorithmic technologies for taxes, social welfare, law enforcement and health care, and private platforms control information and labour markets. This growth has led to a regulatory challenge. Technological innovation proceeds through processing data, training algorithms. Legislative regulation progresses through more time-consuming regulatory mechanisms. This paper explores the field through a doctrinal analysis of legal and regulatory initiatives, such as the European Union AI Act, OECD AI Principles, US executive model and the Indian position under the DPDP Act and NITI Aayog. The paper highlights four recurring issues of accountability and responsibility, bias and discrimination, data governance and regulatory fragmentation. The paper links empirical research trends to legal issues. Richness in the use of ethics and governance terms and scantiness in the doctrinal work on liability and enforcement is noted. The paper recommends a comprehensive regulatory approach with a chain of risk-based classification, impact assessments and sectoral regulatory measures. The novelty is the combination of bibliometric analysis and legal analysis to offer regulators, academics and practitioners an overview of the state of AI governance and its direction.</p>Dr. Manindra Singh Hanspal
Copyright (c) 2026 Dr. Manindra Singh Hanspal
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0
2026-06-302026-06-307014555Navigating IPR Disputes through ADR Mechanism- Study of public policy perspective
https://dmejournals.com/index.php/DMEJL/article/view/664
<p>Intellectual property disputes were often resolved through traditional courts. However,<br>in recent years, parties have increasingly turned to alternative dispute resolution<br>methods, such as arbitration and mediation, to resolve these types of disputes.<br>This shift has been prompted by the success of domain name dispute resolution<br>procedures like the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP). These<br>procedures have made it possible for trademark owners to protect their marks on<br>the internet. Due to the success of domain name dispute resolution procedures,<br>trademark owners can now safeguard their marks on the internet. Alternative dispute<br>resolution (ADR) is widely supported in both developed and developing nations<br>due to its informal procedures, cost-effectiveness, and reduced time commitment.<br>ADR encompasses several methods, including arbitration, mediation, negotiation,<br>conciliation, and collaborative law, which is globally used in voluntary conflict<br>settlement procedures outside of court rules. The range of ADR approaches enables<br>flexibility in resolving disputes between parties. Negotiations and mediation, which<br>are less confrontational, enable parties to settle disputes in continuing commercial<br>relationships without the need for a factfinder, an evidential or legal review, a decision<br>of the validity of underlying claims, or any other substantive procedural requirements.</p>Gurpreet KaurZubair Ahmed Khan
Copyright (c) 2026
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0
2026-06-302026-06-30701110Impact of Technology on Globalization in the Digital Era
https://dmejournals.com/index.php/DMEJL/article/view/665
<p>This study is critical of the performance of technology in defining global distributive<br>justice, and it focuses on how the exacerbating effects of technologies reinforce<br>economic disparities between developed and less developed countries. In the wake<br>of accelerating digitalisation, the study investigates how unequal chances in access<br>to technologies complicate the constitutive pillars of global justice and fairness.<br>It interrogates how the global justice system is exploited through technological<br>disparities and analyzes the implications of the disparities in a world that is increasingly<br>interconnected and unequal. It is driven by three fundamental objectives: (1)<br>determining how technology perpetuates global distributive injustices; (2) assessing<br>the extent to which technological expansion extends economic disparities; and (3)<br>scrutinizing the role of global governance in rectifying such disparities. It responds to<br>pertinent questions of adequacy of global systems in ensuring technological equity<br>and justice. Adopting a qualitative doctrinal approach, it combines thematic analysis,<br>the use of cases, and legal-policy analysis to examine digital sovereignty and the issue<br>of governance. Overall, the study adds to global discourses by providing solutions in<br>the form of strategies for equitable technological growth and calling for inclusive<br>systems of governance that would ensure that technologies serve as instruments of<br>global justice in lieu of causing injustices to deepen further.</p>Aditya SinghαDivya Bhushan
Copyright (c) 2026
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0
2026-06-302026-06-307011124The Role of Law in Combating Gender-Based Violence: Challenges and Legal Reforms for Gender Equality
https://dmejournals.com/index.php/DMEJL/article/view/666
<p>The article discusses the rationale of legal frameworks concerning the fight against<br>gender-based violence (GBV) and gender equality. Despite this significant step<br>towards the actualisation of the fact that GBV is a severe violation of human rights,<br>many legal systems across the entire world have not been capable of giving real<br>preventative and responsive solutions to the vice of violence. This paper discusses<br>the existing legislations which aim at combating GBV and how the loopholes and<br>failures are hindering the implementation and performance of the legislations. It<br>further compares the socio-cultural or institutional barriers that affect access by the<br>survivors to the law. This research unveils effective measures and best practises that<br>have enabled legal intervention in GBV by comparison analysis of other legal reforms.<br>The significance of the research introduces the necessity of having such legal changes<br>so thorough not only to criminalise instances of gender-based violence, but also to<br>accommodate survivor-oriented measures, strengthen enforcement mechanisms,<br>and take it a step further to make the judiciary and law enforcers gender sensitive.<br>As a solution to these, the law can play a radical role in eradicating this inequality<br>(gender) in the system and creating safer and more equal societies. In conclusion, it<br>is suggested in this study that unitary law and a unitary law and policy system should<br>be considered in this study as one of the theories to be used in terms of fighting the<br>gender-based violence.</p>Monalisha KhatunPriyanka Gupta
Copyright (c) 2026
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0
2026-06-302026-06-307012534Caste, Kinship, and Reproductive Autonomy: Constitutional Challenges to Family Control over Women’s Reproductive Decisions
https://dmejournals.com/index.php/DMEJL/article/view/667
<p>This article examines the relationship between caste and kinship as they relate to<br>women’s ability to make decisions about their own reproduction. It utilizes a sociolegal<br>framework to demonstrate that decisions regarding women’s reproduction<br>are frequently determined by family and caste based systems instead of simply<br>being the product of individual decision making. Although the Indian Constitution<br>recognizes reproductive freedom as a fundamental right (Article 21) that falls under<br>the umbrella of privacy, dignity and bodily integrity (Suchita Srivastava v. Chandigarh<br>Administration; K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India), many women experience the<br>coercive actions of their families, specifically when it comes to family-based castes.<br>It posits that patrilineal inheritance patterns, son preference, family marriage<br>expectations, and the authority of a woman’s husband or in-laws all serve as extralegal<br>mechanisms of reproductive governance that significantly undermine women’s<br>decisional autonomy. It draws upon empirical evidence, including studies from Uttar<br>Pradesh and other North Indian contexts that document reproductive coercion in<br>the form of pressure regarding contraception, pregnancy timing, and childbirth,<br>the paper demonstrates how caste and kinship operate as structural sites of rights<br>infringement. It argues that the legal discussions surrounding reproductive rights in<br>India need to evolve away from solely focusing on a state-centred view of reproductive<br>rights violations towards recognizing the family as a significant site of reproductive<br>coercion. Further, it concludes by advocating stronger doctrinal recognition of familial<br>reproductive coercion within constitutional and domestic violence jurisprudence to<br>ensure substantive, rather than merely formal, reproductive autonomy.</p>Shikha Vasishta
Copyright (c) 2026
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0
2026-06-302026-06-307013544Digital Consciousness and Sustainable Consumption Among Generation Z in India: A Socio-Legal Analysis of Corporate Accountability in The Digital Marketplace
https://dmejournals.com/index.php/DMEJL/article/view/669
<p>The rise of digital ecosystems has changed the consumption patterns of Generation<br>Z in India, making them a socially conscious, ecologically aware, and digitally savvy<br>generation. Digital consciousness, informed by digital activism, algorithmic exposure,<br>and participatory digital culture, has been a strong driver of Gen Z’s attitudes toward<br>sustainable living. At the same time, this quest for ethical consumption cuts across<br>legal regimes relating to consumer protection, corporate accountability, environmental<br>governance, and digital transparency. This paper critically probes the extent to which<br>Indian law supports or inhibits sustainable consumption in the digital marketplace,<br>particularly in light of misinformation, greenwashing, and nontransparent corporate<br>practices. The paper indicates the dire need for more developed accountability<br>mechanisms to translate the sustainability concerns of Gen Z into structural change<br>through an analysis of statutory instruments, judicial developments, scholarship,<br>and market trends.</p>Divyanshi Shukla
Copyright (c) 2026
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0
2026-06-302026-06-307015667Media, Mind, and Market Exploring the Psychological and Cultural Drivers of Generation Z’s Consumer Behaviour
https://dmejournals.com/index.php/DMEJL/article/view/670
<p>Generation Z represents a transformative consumer segment shaped by rapid<br>technological advancement, pervasive social media influence, and global cultural<br>integration. Their consumption behaviour reflects notable shifts in both physiological<br>and cultural dimensions. Continuous exposure to fast-paced digital environments has<br>influenced attention spans, reward processing, and sensory engagement, fostering<br>a preference for immediacy and visually oriented content. Culturally, Generation Z<br>prioritises authenticity, sustainability, and inclusivity, seeking brands that resonate<br>with personal identity and collective social values. Drawing on a systematic review of<br>contemporary literature encompassing theoretical, contextual, and methodological<br>perspectives, this study provides a comprehensive analysis of the factors shaping Gen<br>Z’s consumption behaviour. It further explores the interaction between digital-age<br>physiological adaptations and evolving cultural norms, highlighting the central role of<br>media in driving psychological and cultural transformations in consumer behaviour.</p>Anu KharwarAbhay Dubey
Copyright (c) 2026
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0
2026-06-302026-06-307016878Deaf Women in India: A Critical Overview of the Legal Framework through Right Based and Intersectionality Theories
https://dmejournals.com/index.php/DMEJL/article/view/671
<p>The disability law framework in India is based on the right- based approach to disability<br>which entitles all disabled persons with rights and recognition in par with all other<br>people. However, the global disability laws often did not consider the differences<br>within the disabled community and viewed them as a homogenous group. The<br>intersectionality theory however views the problems of marginalised groups in<br>intersection with the multiple identities they possess. Therefore, the problems of<br>deaf women should be viewed in the intersection of disability, gender and cultural<br>identities. This paper is a study to examine the issues of rights of deaf women in IndiaThe disability law framework in India is based on the right- based approach to disability<br>which entitles all disabled persons with rights and recognition in par with all other<br>people. However, the global disability laws often did not consider the differences<br>within the disabled community and viewed them as a homogenous group. The<br>intersectionality theory however views the problems of marginalised groups in<br>intersection with the multiple identities they possess. Therefore, the problems of<br>deaf women should be viewed in the intersection of disability, gender and cultural<br>identities. This paper is a study to examine the issues of rights of deaf women in India right-based approach.</p>Sreedurga T. N
Copyright (c) 2026
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0
2026-06-302026-06-307017987